posted by: Nick Lowles | on: Sunday, 18 November 2012, 10:34
So the Conservative Party have appointed Lynton Crosby to run their next election campaign and obviously hope he can reverse the party’s current fortunes. He certainly has a track record of winning elections, but at what cost?
Crosby is known at pushing populist issues around immigration and crime and creating ‘wedge’ issues to differentiate political parties and split the opposition. In Australia, where he is from, Crosby masterminded John Howard’s numerous election victories but often by running what many considered were racist and inflammatory campaigns. In the 2001 Australian General Election Howard’s government ministers falsely claimed that seafaring asylum seekers had thrown children overboard in a presumed ploy to secure rescue and passage to Australia, and Howard, in the final days of the campaign, launched a slogan that later grew notorious: "We decide who will come into this country."
This was similar to Michael Howard’s “Are you thinking what we are thinking?” campaign slogan in the 2005 General Election, and which included a series of posters, billboards, TV commercials and direct mail pieces with messages like "It's not racist to impose limits on immigration" and "how would you feel if a bloke on early release attacked your daughter?"focused on hot-button issues like dirty hospitals, landgrabs by "gypsies" and restraints on police behaviour.
Crosby was once again advising.
However, new allegations have been raised over his behaviour during the recent London Mayoral elections, where he advised Boris Johnson. According to reports in the Daily Mail, “Mr Crosby said Mr Johnson should concentrate on traditional Tory voters instead of ‘f****** Muslims’. The source added: ‘He definitely used that phrase’ and said: ‘Lynton’s view was that chasing the Muslim vote and other ethnic groups was a waste of time – and he frequently expressed himself in very strong terms. Some people found it very offensive.’”
Mr Crosby’s outburst came earlier this year as Mr Johnson’s aides discussed whether to devote more attention to wooing the ethnic minority vote in his battle with Labour’s Ken Livingstone.
Conveniently, there appears to be collective amnesia on this as both Crosby and Johnson, when pressed, cannot remember these words being used. However, their choice of words is as close to an admission as one can get without admitting it as this claim would have been fiercely denied if it had not been said.
But there is a wider issue here. For several years David Cameron has been trying to rid the party of its ‘nasty’ image – an image created partly by Crosby himself. With the Conservatives slipping in the polls and the Government in apparent disarray this is obviously of secondary importance to winning the next election.
Crosby’s appointment also represents a victory for hardliners within the Conservative Party, some of whom are annoyed at the liberal drift within the political leadership and growing concern over the rise of UKIP and its ability to do to the Tories what the BNP did to Labour.
Given Crosby’s track record, his hiring will also probably result in the abandoning of a strategy which has been devised by Conservative Party Central Office over the past twelve months to appeal to minority communities. This was motivated by a desire to demonstrate its more moderate, centrist face but also a realisation that it is unlikely to win a majority after the next General Election without increased support from particularly the British Asian communities.
Indeed, it has drawn up a list of 15 constituencies across England where the votes of minority communities are essential to the Conservatives winning. All are currently held by Labour and CCO believe that without victories in these constituencies an overall election victory is unlikely.
Crosby’s appointment will not make this job any easier. Indeed, if past performance is anything to go by he perhaps thinks that the Conservatives can simply appeal to their base with strong talk on law and order, immigration and Europe and stop the haemorrhaging of votes to UKIP and they will squeeze back in. Of course it is a strategy that might well work but society will be a worse place for it. And – significantly – the Conservatives will once again earn the title of the Nasty party.
Comments from Crosby like “f***ing Muslims” are likely to haunt David Cameron but he will only have himself to blame.
Posted: 18 Nov 2012 | There are 4 comments
Comment 1 | From: B31 Antifascist | Date: 18 November 2012, 11:30
In addition to the editors and readers of the quantity not quality press and UKIP, the Tories are also under attack from big gobbed environment haters such as Delingpole and Clarkson, and it has to be said, the Countryside Alliance and cruel sports lobby, which will NOT go away. As more and more Lib Dems express dissatisfaction with a one-way Coalition a huge lurch rightwards is absolutely inevitable, if only to appeal to the vacuum left by the nazi BNP and EDL yobbos who don't believe smoking causes cancer, heart disease and erectile dysfunction because they're too stupid.
Comment 2 | From: sue grant | Date: 18 November 2012, 13:48
yet more news to despair about with this coalition government another right wing bigot to add to the cameron crew
Comment 3 | From: Mike in S Devon | Date: 19 November 2012, 16:26
"Are you thinking what we're thinking?" I'm thinking didn't he pinch that from the Bananas in Pyjamas? Shows the intellectual level of the rightie bigots :-)
Comment 4 | From: B31 Antifascist | Date: 20 November 2012, 08:30
No Tory will truthfully elaborate upon why immigration happens, which is rooted in profit and human exploitation. Immigrant workers are treated like dirt by unscrupulous bosses, keen as they are to capitalise - and it's been like that since the days of Huguenot and post-famine Irish immigration to Britain. But then again the Tories only tell you one side of the tale.....
You can comment on this article here (All fields required)